I know this is really terrible, but I haven’t quite yet been able to clearly define what I want my “communication question” for my advocacy project to be. I have this broad idea of what I what it is floating around in my head, but I seem to be unable to put it nicely into just a sentence or two. Plus I’ve never done an advocacy project or formed a “communication question” before, so I’m not entirely sure I’m on the right track. I could really use some feedback!
Broad Ideas for my “communication question”:
-What is the most effective way to get my message across to people? Will my efforts be most fruitful if I focus directly on one group of people who are already inclined to take your advice, given the project’s time constraints? Or is it better to try to get the message across to as many different types of people as possible, especially those who are not quite as likely to be interested in my issue, but might be most greatly affected?
-Mollie
Over and Out
15 years ago
1 comment:
-Mollie
If you are still doing the guerrilla project I would just hit as many people as you can. The question then would be first is this effective and second am I hitting the right people. Try and think about the kind of person you are going to influence. In doing this campaign you open up different discourses between different people, namely yourself and your intended and unintended audience. This is what I think you could focus your paper about. Also kind of what the cecearelli piece was talking about with what you decide to put on your pamphlet, or what ever you decide to you. I am sure you could write tons of stuff about how you did this process, what you choose in the end and why.
-Blaise
Post a Comment